skip to main content
research-article

Successful Online Socialization: Lessons from the Wikipedia Education Program

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Attracting and retaining newcomers is critical and challenging for online production communities such as Wikipedia, both because volunteers need specialized training and are likely to leave before being integrated into the community. In response to these challenges, the Wikimedia Foundation started the Wiki Education Project (Wiki Ed), an online program in which college students edit Wikipedia articles as class assignments. The Wiki Ed program incorporates many components of institutional socialization, a process many conventional organizations successfully use to integrate new employees through formalized on-boarding practices. Research has not adequately investigated whether Wiki Ed and similar programs are effective ways to integrate volunteers in online communities, and, if so, the mechanisms involved. This paper evaluates the Wiki Ed program by comparing 16,819 student editors in 770 Wiki Ed classes with new editors who joined Wikipedia in the conventional way. The evaluation shows that the Wiki Ed students did more work, improved articles more, and were more committed to Wikipedia. For example, compared to new editors who joined Wikipedia in the conventional way they were twice as likely to still be editing Wikipedia a year after their Wiki Ed class was finished. Further, students in classrooms that encouraged joint activity, a key component of institutional socialization, produced better quality work than those in classrooms where students worked independently. These findings are consistent with an interpretation that the Wiki Ed program was successful because it incorporated elements of institutionalized socialization.

References

  1. DG Allen. 2006. Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover? Journal of Management, Vol. 32, 2 (2006), 237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N.J. Allen and J.P. Meyer. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, Vol. 63, 1 (1990), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Joshua D Angrist, Guido W Imbens, and Donald B Rubin. 1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American statistical Association, Vol. 91, 434 (1996), 444--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jaime Arguello, Brian S. Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, Robert Kraut, Kimberly S. Ling, Carolyn Rosé, and Xiaoqing Wang. 2006. Talk to Me: Foundations for Successful Individual-group Interactions in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 959--968. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Blake K Ashforth and Alan M Saks. 1996. Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, 1 (1996), 149--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Talya N. Bauer, Todd Bodner, Berrin Erdogan, Donald M. Truxillo, and Jennifer S. Tucker. 2007. Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, 3 (2007), 707--721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021--9010.92.3.707Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Moira Burke, Cameron Marlow, and Thomas Lento. 2009. Feed Me: Motivating Newcomer Contribution in Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 945--954. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Moira Burke and Burr Settles. 2011. Plugged in to the Community: Social Motivators in Online Goal-setting Groups. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2103354.2103356Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Brian Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, and Jacqueline Pike. 2008. Don't Look Now, But We've Created a Bureaucracy: The Nature and Roles of Policies and Rules in Wikipedia .ACM Press, New York, 1102--1110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brian Butler, Lee Sproull, Sara Kiesler, and Robert Kraut. 2002. Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why. Leadership at a distance: Research in technologically supported work (2002), 171--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jilin Chen, Yuqing Ren, and John Riedl. 2010. The Effects of Diversity on Group Productivity and Member Withdrawal in Online Volunteer Groups. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 821--830. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Boreum Choi, Kira Alexander, Robert E. Kraut, and John M. Levine. 2010. Socialization Tactics in Wikipedia and Their Effects. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107--116. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia and Dario Taraborelli. 2015. MoodBar: Increasing new user retention in Wikipedia through lightweight socialization. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 734--742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Laura Dabbish, Rosta Farzan, Robert Kraut, and Tom Postmes. 2012. Fresh faces in the crowd: turnover, identity, and commitment in online groups. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 245--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2005. Socialization in an Open Source Software Community: A Socio-Technical Analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 14, 4 (2005), 323 -- 368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rosta Farzan, Laura A Dabbish, Robert E Kraut, and Tom Postmes. 2011. Increasing commitment to online communities by designing for social presence. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 321--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rosta Farzan and Shuguang Han. 2014. My Friends Are Here!: Why Talk to "Strangers"?. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 161--164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556490Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rosta Farzan and Robert E. Kraut. 2013. Wikipedia Classroom Experiment: Bidirectional Benefits of Students' Engagement in Online Production Communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 783--792. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470765Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Saiph Savage, and Dario Taraborelli. 2016. Leadwise: using online bots to recruite and guide expert volunteers. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. ACM, 257--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wiki Education Foundation. 2019. Does editing Wikipedia change a student's life?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shenyang Guo and Mark W Fraser. 2014. Propensity score analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Vol. 12. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Aaron Halfaker. 2017. Interpolating quality dynamics in Wikipedia and demonstrating the Keilana effect. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Aaron Halfaker, R Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, 5 (2013), 664--688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Aaron Halfaker, R Stuart Geiger, and Loren G Terveen. 2014. Snuggle: Designing for efficient socialization and ideological critique. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 311--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Aaron Halfaker, Aniket Kittur, and John Riedl. 2011. Don'T Bite the Newbies: How Reverts Affect the Quantity and Quality of Wikipedia Work. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 163--172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038585Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Akshay Java, Xiaodan Song, Tim Finin, and Belle Tseng. 2007. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis. ACM, 56--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gareth R Jones. 1986. Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management journal, Vol. 29, 2 (1986), 262--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sara Kiesler, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W McGuire. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American psychologist, Vol. 39, 10 (1984), 1123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Isabel Kloumann, Lada Adamic, Jon Kleinberg, and Shaomei Wu. 2015. The lifecycles of apps in a social ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 581--591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Robert E Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Moira Burke, Yan Chen, Niki Kittur, Joseph Konstan, Yuqing Ren, and John Riedl. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design .MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Cliff Lampe and Erik Johnston. 2005. Follow the (Slash) Dot: Effects of Feedback on New Members in an Online Community. In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1099203.1099206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Meryl Reis Louis. 1980. Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative science quarterly (1980), 226--251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Meryl R Louis, Barry Z Posner, and Gary N Powell. 1983. The availability and helpfulness of socialization practices. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 36, 4 (1983), 857--866.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Richard L. Moreland. 1985. Social categorization and the assimilation of" new" group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 48, 5 (1985), 1173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jonathan T Morgan, Siko Bouterse, Heather Walls, and Sarah Stierch. 2013. Tea and sympathy: crafting positive new user experiences on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 839--848.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jonathan T Morgan and Aaron Halfaker. 2018. Evaluating the impact of the Wikipedia Teahouse on newcomer socialization and retention., 20 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison. 2002. Newcomers' relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of management Journal, Vol. 45, 6 (2002), 1149--1160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sneha Narayan, Jake Orlowitz, Jonathan Morgan, Benjamin Mako Hill, and Aaron Shaw. 2017. The Wikipedia Adventure: Field Evaluation of an Interactive Tutorial for New Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 1785--1799.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Katherine Panciera, Aaron Halfaker, and Loren Terveen. 2009. Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work(GROUP'09). ACM, 51--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Yuqing Ren, F Maxwell Harper, Sara Drenner, Loren G Terveen, Sara B Kiesler, John Riedl, and Robert E Kraut. 2012. Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, 3 (2012), 841--864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Yuqing Ren, Robert E. Kraut, and Sara Kiesler. 2007. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, Vol. 28, 3 (2007), 377--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. P. Resnick, R. Zeckhauser, J. Swanson, and K. Lockwood. 2006. The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, Vol. 9, 2 (2006), 79--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Alan M. Saks and Blake E. Ashforth. 1997. Organizational Socialization: Making Sense of the Past and Present as a Prologue for the Future. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 51, 2 (1997), 234 -- 279. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1614Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Yla Tausczik, Rosta Farzan, John Levine, and Robert Kraut. 2018. Effects of Collective Socialization on Newcomers' Response to Feedback in Online Communities. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, Vol. 1, 2 (2018), 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. John Eastin Van Maanen and Edgar Henry Schein. 1977. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior (1977). https://doi.org/10.1.1.475.8533Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Matthew A Vetter, Zachary J McDowell, and Mahala Stewart. 2019. From Opportunities to Outcomes: The Wikipedia-Based Writing Assignment. Computers and Composition, Vol. 52 (2019), 53--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Morten Warncke-Wang, Vladislav R Ayukaev, Brent Hecht, and Loren G Terveen. 2015. The success and failure of quality improvement projects in peer production communities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 743--756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Morten Warncke-Wang, Dan Cosley, and John Riedl. 2013. Tell me more: an actionable quality model for Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. ACM, 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jodi L Wilson. 2013. Proceed with extreme caution: Citation to wikipedia in light of contributor demographics and content policies. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, Vol. 16 (2013), 857--908.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Bo Xu and Dahui Li. 2015. An empirical study of the motivations for content contribution and community participation in Wikipedia. Information & management, Vol. 52, 3 (2015), 275--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Diyi Yang, Aaron Halfaker, Robert E Kraut, and Eduard H Hovy. 2016. Who Did What: Editor Role Identification in Wikipedia.. In ICWSM. 446--455.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Heng-Li Yang and Cheng-Yu Lai. 2010. Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, 6 (2010), 1377--1383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Dell Zhang, Karl Prior, Mark Levene, Robert Mao, and Diederik van Liere. 2014. Leave or stay: The departure dynamics of Wikipedia editors. In Advanced Data Mining and Applications, Shuigeng Zhou, Songmao Zhang, and George Karypis (Eds.), Vol. 7713. Springer, Nanjing, China, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Haiyi Zhu, Amy Zhang, Jiping He, Robert E. Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2013. Effects of Peer Feedback on Contribution: A Field Experiment in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2253--2262. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481311Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Successful Online Socialization: Lessons from the Wikipedia Education Program

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      May 2020
      1285 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3403424
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 May 2020
      Published in pacmhci Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader