You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two naming variants possible when creating AS-SET objects: flat (example: AS-SNIJDERS) or hierarchical (example: AS15562:AS-SNIJDERS).
A next version of IRRd would probably benefit from encouraging users to create AS-SET objects following the hierarchical convention, this can be achieved by rejecting newAS-SET objects that do not follow the hierarchical convention.
The submitter of the object should be presented with a clear error and a suggestion what to do instead of a flat name.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are two naming variants possible when creating
AS-SET
objects: flat (example:AS-SNIJDERS
) or hierarchical (example:AS15562:AS-SNIJDERS
).A next version of IRRd would probably benefit from encouraging users to create
AS-SET
objects following the hierarchical convention, this can be achieved by rejecting newAS-SET
objects that do not follow the hierarchical convention.The submitter of the object should be presented with a clear error and a suggestion what to do instead of a flat name.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: