Skip to main content

Winds of Change: Engaging with Conflicting Perspectives in Renewable Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Broadening Cultural Horizons in Social Marketing

Abstract

This study examines public attitudes towards climate change and policies to limit greenhouse gases such as through the expansion of renewable energy sources. The study includes a critical examination of the apparent contradiction between belief in climate change and generalized support for renewable energy, as revealed in this survey, and of opposition to the placement of large-scale renewable energy generators such as wind farms. The literature identifies significant psychogenic influences leading to opposition to specific wind farm sitting as well as strong policy support for coal mining in Australia, but these appear to be ignored or dismissed by environmentalists, leading to ineffective communication on the issues and, ultimately, to entrenched opposition to an energy transition. We use social marketing benchmarks to identify engagement strategies that may increase understanding of the need to reduce fossil fuel consumption, alleviate anxiety about wind farm impacts and improve acceptance of renewable energy generation strategies overall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitken M (2010) Wind power and community benefits: challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 38(10):6066–6075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen AR (1995) Marketing social change: changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, p 101

    Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio N, MacGill I, Abbad JR, Beltran H (2012) Comparison of wind energy support policy and electricity market design in Europe, the United States, and Australia. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 3(4):809–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Batel S, Devine-Wright P (2015) A critical and empirical analysis of the national-local ‘gap’ in public responses to large-scale energy infrastructures. J Environ Plan Manag 58(6):1076–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Batel S, Devine-Wright P, Tangeland T (2013) Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: a critical discussion. Energy Policy 58:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beben R (2015) The role of social marketing in overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. J Positive Manag 6(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell D, Gray T, Haggett C, Swaffield J (2013) Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environ Polit 22(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson H (1997) The nocebo effect: history and physiology. Prev Med 26(5):612–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell D (2013) The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy 58:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell D (2016) The effects of information on public attitudes toward renewable energy. Environ Behav 48(6):743–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanes-Vidal V, Schwartz J (2016) Adverse health effects attributed to wind turbines: have we been missing important co-exposures? In: ISEE conference abstracts

    Google Scholar 

  • Botelho A, Arezes P, Bernardo C, Dias H, Pinto LMC (2015) Effects of turbine noise from wind farms on local residents’ decision to adopt mitigation measures. Paper presented at the proceedings 8th international conference on environmental and geological science and engineering (EG’15)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environ change 14(2):125–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff MT, Mansfield M (2008) ‘Ye Olde Hot Aire’*: reporting on human contributions to climate change in the UK tabloid press. Environ Res Lett 3(2):024002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekel T, Alfken C (2015) Gone with the wind? The impact of wind turbines on tourism demand. Energy Policy 86:506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfman NC, Jiménez RB, Arévalo PC, Cifuentes LA (2012) Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy Policy 46:246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Clim Change 114(2):169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burningham K, Barnett J, Walker G (2015) An array of deficits: unpacking NIMBY discourses in wind energy developers’ conceptualizations of their local opponents. Soc Nat Resour 28(3):246–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes L, Brown C, Foster J, Wagner LD (2013) Australian renewable energy policy: barriers and challenges. Renewable Energy 60:711–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert A, Bishop C, Elliot R, Krebs E, Kydd T, Machtans C, Robertson G (2013) A synthesis of human-related avian mortality in Canada. Avian Conserv Ecol 8(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Cornish S, Ashworth P, Gardner J, Fraser SJ (2011) Exploring the orientations which characterise the likely public acceptance of low emission energy technologies. Climatic Change 107(3-4):549–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass N, Walker G (2009) Emotion and rationality: the characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects. Emot Space Soc 2(1):62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, Joshi K, Fry L (2014) Fomenting sickness: nocebo priming of residents about expected wind turbine health harms. Front Pub Health 2:279

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang C (2019) Federal election 2019: the energy policies of labour and the coalition. https://www.news.com.au/finance/money/costs/federal-election-2019-the-energy-policies-of-labor-and-the-coalition/news-story/89f6a8bc58e181f70158f3c71b6e89e5

  • Chapman S (2013) Turbine hosts ‘not bothered. Farmonline, sourced from the conversation. http://www.farmonline.com.au/news/agriculture/general/opinion/turbine-hosts-not-bothered/2671889.aspx. Accessed 1 Dec 2017

  • Chapman S, George AS, Waller K, Cakic V (2013) The pattern of complaints about Australian wind farms does not match the establishment and distribution of turbines: support for the psychogenic, ‘communicated disease’ hypothesis. PLoS ONE 8(10):e76584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JL, Liu HH, Chuang CT (2015) Strategic planning to reduce conflicts for offshore wind development in Taiwan: a social marketing perspective. Mar Pollut Bull 99(1–2):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung G, Davies PJ (2017) In the transformation of energy systems: what is holding Australia back? Energy Policy 109:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke CE (2008) A question of balance: the autism-vaccine controversy in the British and American Elite Press. Sci Commun 30(1):77–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clean Energy Council (2019) Clean energy Australia report 2019. https://assets.cleanenergycouncil.org.au/documents/resources/reports/clean-energy-australia/clean-energy-australia-report-2019.pdf

  • Colloca L, Miller FG (2011) Role of expectations in health. Curr Opin Psychiatry 24:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner A, Randall A (2011) Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement. Glob Environ Change 21(3):1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook J, Lewandowsky S, Ecker UK (2017) Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE 12(5):e0175799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R, Patterson C (2009) Managing the health effects of climate change. The Lancet 373(9676):1693–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton F, Petrie KJ (2015a) Health complaints and wind turbines: the efficacy of explaining the nocebo response to reduce symptom reporting. Environ Res 140:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton F, Dodd G, Schmid G, Gamble G, Petrie KJ (2014) Can expectations produce symptoms from infrasound associated with wind turbines? Health Psychol 33(4):360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton F, Petrie KJ (2015b) Accentuate the positive: counteracting psychogenic responses to media health messages in the age of the Internet. J Psychosom Res 79(3):185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2018) Annual update finds renewables are cheapest new build power. https://www.csiro.au/en/News/News-releases/2018/Annual-update-finds-renewables-are-cheapest-new-build-power. Accessed 21 Dec 2018

  • Dahlstrom MF, Dudo A, Brossard D (2012) Precision of information, sensational information, and self-efficacy information as message-level variables affecting risk perceptions. Risk Anal Int J 32(1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deignan B, Hoffman-Goetz L (2015) Emotional tone of Ontario newspaper articles on the health effects of industrial wind turbines before and after policy change. J Health Commun 20(5):531–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright P (2007) Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review. Beyond Nimbyism: a multidisciplinary investigation of public engagement with renewable energy technologies, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright P (2008) Reconsidering public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review. Delivering a low carbon electricity system: technologies, economics and policy, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine‐Wright P (2009) Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 19(6):426–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright P (2011) Public engagement with large-scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism. Wiley Interdis Rev Clim Change 2(1):19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibb S (2014) Up, up and away: social marketing breaks free. J Mark Manag 30(11–12):1159–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djerf-Pierre M, Cokley J, Kuchel LJ (2015) Framing renewable energy: a comparative study of newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environ Commun 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockerty T, Appleton K, Lovett A (2012) Public opinion on energy crops in the landscape: considerations for the expansion of renewable energy from biomass. J Environ Plan Manag 55(9):1134–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling R, McGuirk P, Maalsen S (2018) Multiscalar governance of urban energy transitions in Australia: the cases of Sydney and Melbourne. Energy Res Soc Sci 44:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duić N, Urbaniec K, Huisingh D (2015) Components and structures of the pillars of sustainability. J Cleaner Prod 88:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy D (2003) Corporate sustainability: challenge to managerial orthodoxies. J Manag Org 9(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagle L, Hamann M, Low D (2016) The role of social marketing, marine turtles and sustainable tourism in reducing plastic pollution. Mar Pollut Bull 107(1):324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagle L, Low D, Case P, Vandommele L (2015) Attitudes of undergraduate business students toward sustainability issues. Int J Sustain High Educ 16(5):650–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer O, Flachsland C (2013) Transforming the global energy system: pathways towards a sustainable energy supply. Global trends

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellabban O, Abu-Rub H, Blaabjerg F (2014) Renewable energy resources: current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:748–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enevoldsen P, Sovacool BK (2016) Examining the social acceptance of wind energy: practical guidelines for onshore wind project development in France. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faasse K, Petrie KJ (2013) The nocebo effect: Patient expectations and medication side effects. Postgrad Med J 89:540–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel A (2017) Independent review into the future security of the national electricity market—blueprint for the future—a snapshot. Department of the Environment and Energy, Australian Government, Canberra. https://www.energy.gov.au/government-priorities/energy-markets/independent-review-future-security-national-electricity-market

  • Fournis Y, Fortin MJ (2017) From social ‘acceptance’ to social ‘acceptability’ of wind energy projects: towards a territorial perspective. J Environ Plan Manag 60(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French J, Russell-Bennett R (2015) A hierarchical model of social marketing. Journal of Social Marketing 5(2):139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl C, Reichl J (2016) Realizing energy infrastructure projects—a qualitative empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance. Energy Policy 89:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2014) Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult Soc 31:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoscience Australia (2010) Australia energy resource assessment. Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism, Australian Government, Canberra. https://d28rz98at9flks.cloudfront.net/70142/70142_complete.pdf

  • Gordon R (2013) Unlocking the potential of upstream social marketing. Eur J Mark 47(9):1525–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green M (2016) Community power. Nat Energy 1:16014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross L (2009) A broken trust: lessons from the vaccine–autism wars. PLoS Biol 7(5):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guidolin M, Alpcan T (2019) Transition to sustainable energy generation in Australia: interplay between coal, gas and renewables. Renew Energy 139:359–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall NL (2014) Can the “social licence to operate” concept enhance engagement and increase acceptance of renewable energy? A case study of wind farms in Australia. Soc Epistemol 28(3–4):219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall N, Ashworth P, Devine-Wright P (2013) Societal acceptance of wind farms: analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy 58:200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall NL, Taplin R (2008) Room for climate advocates in a coal-focused economy? NGO influence on Australian climate policy. Aust J Soc Iss 43(3):359–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall N, Lacey J, Carr-Cornish S, Dowd A-M (2015) Social licence to operate: understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries. J Clean Prod 86:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havas M, Colling D (2011) Wind turbines make waves: why some residents near wind turbines become ill. Bull Sci Technol Soc 31(5):414–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head BW (2008) Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3(2):101

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvelplund F, Østergaard PA, Meyer NI (2017) Incentives and barriers for wind power expansion and system integration in Denmark. Energy Policy 107:573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong BD, Slatick ER (1994) Carbon dioxide emissions factors for coal. US Energy Information Agency (EIA), Washington DC. http://www.eia.gov/coal/production/quarterly/co2_article/co2.html

  • Howard T (2015) Olivebranches and idiot’s guides: frameworks for community engagement in Australian wind farm development. Energy Policy 78:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2018) Global energy & CO2 status report. https://www.iea.org/geco/renewables/

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2019) Monthly electricity statistics 2019. https://www.iea.org/media/statistics/surveys/electricity/mes.pdf

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Core writing team: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/

  • IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

  • Kallies A (2016) A barrier for Australia’s climate commitments? Law, the electricity market and transitioning the stationary electricity sector. UNSW Law J 39(4):1547–1582

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin T, Anker T (2014) Cultural capital and strategic social marketing orientations. J Soc Mark 4(2):94–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopper LD, Ollson CA, McCallum LC, Aslund MLW, Berger RG, Souweine K, McDaniel M (2015) Wind turbines and human health. Front Pub Health 63:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopper LD, Ollson CA (2011) Health effects and wind turbines: a review of the literature. Environ Health 10(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson EC, Krannich RS (2016) “A great idea, just not near me!” understanding public attitudes about renewable energy facilities. Soc Nat Resour 29(12):1436–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon M, Scott M (2015) Contending expertise: an interpretive approach to (Re) conceiving wind power’s ‘planning problem’. J Environ Plan Policy Manag 17(5):593–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton TM (2011) Early warning of climate tipping points. Nat Clim Change 1(4):201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky S, Ecker UH, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J (2012) Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest 13(3):106–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie S, Franetovich M, Sharma S, Rolfe J (2008) Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 26(3):177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Change 17(3–4):445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luca NR, Hibbert S, McDonald R (2016) Midstream value creation in social marketing. J Mark Manag 32(11–12):1145–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas C (2019). Not everyone cares about climate change, but reproach won’t change their minds. https://theconversation.com/not-everyone-cares-about-climate-change-but-reproach-wont-change-their-minds-118255

  • Marques AT, Batalha H, Rodrigues S, Costa H, Pereira MJR, Fonseca C, Bernardino J (2014) Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: an updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies. Biol Cons 179:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau TM, Sowden AJ, Armstrong D (2002) Implementing research findings into practice: beyond the information deficit model. Getting research findings into practice. London: BMJ Books, 68–76

    Google Scholar 

  • McCunney RJ, Mundt KA, Colby WD, Dobie R, Kaliski K, Blais M (2014) Wind turbines and health: a critical review of the scientific literature. J Occup Environ Med 56(11):e108–e130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May R, Reitan O, Bevanger K, Lorentsen SH, Nygård T (2015) Mitigating wind-turbine induced avian mortality: sensory, aerodynamic and cognitive constraints and options. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlin T, Newton S, Ellery B, Milverton J, Farah C (2013) Systematic review of the human health effects of wind farms. National Health & Medical Research Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft J (2011) Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1(1):70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegaki AN (2012) A social marketing mix for renewable energy in Europe based on consumer stated preference surveys. Renew Energy 39(1):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsch J, Goldblatt DL, Flüeler T, Spreng D (2012) The indispensable role of social science in energy research. In: Tackling long-term global energy problems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 23–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Muenstermann I (2012) Australia’s climate change, wind farming, coal industry and the ‘big carbon plan’: mine coal, sell coal, repeat until rich. Rural Soc 21(3):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moula M, Maula J, Hamdy M, Fang T, Jung N, Lahdelma R (2013) Researching social acceptability of renewable energy technologies in Finland. Int Jo Sustain Built Environ 2:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council (2016) NHMRC awards funding into wind farms and human health. Canberra. Press release 22 March 2016. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/media/releases/2016/nhmrc-awards-funding-wind-farms-and-human-health. Accessed 1 Dec 2017

  • National Social Marketing Centre (n.d). NSMC benchmark criteria. NSMC, London. https://www.thensmc.com/content/nsmc-benchmark-criteria-1

  • Nelson T (2016) Redesigning a 20th century regulatory framework to deliver 21st century energy technology. J Bioecon 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Onakpoya IJ, O’Sullivan J, Thompson MJ, Heneghan CJ (2015) The effect of wind turbine noise on sleep and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Environ Int 82:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens S, Driffill L (2008) How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energy Policy 36(12):4412–4418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard RG, Yeo M (2011) Medical and health news and information in the UK media: the current state of knowledge. A report of the Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova MA (2016) From NIMBY to acceptance: toward a novel framework—VESPA—for organizing and interpreting community concerns. Renew Energy 86:1280–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierpont N (2009) Wind turbine syndrome. K-selected books

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon N, Demski CC (2012) From nuclear to renewable: energy system transformation and public attitudes. Bull Atom Sci 68(4):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF, Lorenzoni I (2006) Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: summary findings of a survey conducted during October and November 2005. Technical report (Understanding Risk Working Paper 06-02). Centre for Environmental Risk, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government (n.d) Powering Queensland plan. https://www.dnrme.qld.gov.au/energy/initiatives/powering-queensland

  • Queensland Renewable Energy Expert Panel (2016) Final report—credible pathways to a 50% renewable energy target for Queensland. https://www.dews.qld.gov.au/electricity/solar/solar-future/expert-panel

  • Read DL, Brown RF, Thorsteinsson EB, Morgan M, Price I (2013) The theory of planned behaviour as a model for predicting public opposition to wind farm developments. J Environ Psychol 36:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddington G, McArthur D, Harrison T, Gibson H (2010) Assessing the economic impact of wind farms on tourism in Scotland: GIS, surveys and policy outcomes. Int J Tourism Res 12(3):237–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie H, Roser M (2019) CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions

  • Rothschild ML (1999) Carrots, sticks, and promises: a conceptual framework for the management of public health and social issue behaviors. J Mark 63(4):24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin GJ, Burns M, Wessely S (2014) Possible psychological mechanisms for “wind turbine syndrome”. On the windmills of your mind. Noise Health 16:116–22. http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2014;volume=16;issue=69;spage=116;epage=122;aulast=Rubin

  • Russell-Bennett R, Wood M, Previte J (2013) Fresh ideas: services thinking for social marketing. J Soc Mark 3(3):223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu BK (2018) Wind energy developments and policies in China: a short review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1393–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders SG, Barrington DJ, Sridharan S (2015) Redefining social marketing: beyond behavioural change. J Soc Mark 5(2):160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šćepanović S, Warnier M, Nurminen JK (2017) The role of context in residential energy interventions: a meta review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:1146–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA (2008) Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. Am J Prev Med 35(5):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw K, Hill SD, Boyd AD, Monk L, Reid J, Einsiedel EF (2015) Conflicted or constructive? Exploring community responses to new energy developments in Canada. Energy Res Soc Sci 8:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheavly SB, Register KM (2007) Marine debris & plastics: environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. J Polym Environ 15(4):301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JH, Klokker M (2014) Health effects related to wind turbine noise exposure: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 9(12):e114183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg L, Bolderdijk JW, Keizer K, Perlaviciute G (2014) An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. J Environ Psychol 38:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoutenborough JW, Vedlitz A (2016) The role of scientific knowledge in the public’s perceptions of energy technology risks. Energy Policy 96:206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoutenborough JW, Shi L, Vedlitz A (2015) Probing public perceptions on energy: support for a comparative, deep-probing survey design for complex issue domains. Energy 81:406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK (2014) What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK (2016) How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res Soc Sci 13:202–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel D (1997) Trauma, dissociation, and memory

    Google Scholar 

  • Sütterlin B, Siegrist M (2017) Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power. Energy Policy 106:356–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwel BW, Koudenburg FA, ter Mors E (2014) Public responses to community compensation: the importance of prior consultations with local residents. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 24(6):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonin R, Brett J, Colagiuri B (2016) The effect of infrasound and negative expectations to adverse pathological symptoms from wind farms. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control 35(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truelove HB (2012) Energy source perceptions and policy support: image associations, emotional evaluations, and cognitive beliefs. Energy Policy 45:478–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2015) Australia—disaster and risk profile. UNISDR, Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/countries/statistics/?cid=9

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2015) Adoption of the Paris agreement. UNFCCC, Geneva. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf

  • Walker G, Devine-Wright P, Hunter S, High H, Evans B (2010) Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy 38(6):2655–2663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CR, Birnie RV (2009) Re-powering Scotland: wind farms and the ‘energy or environment?’Debate. Scott Geogr J 125(2):97–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren B, Christoff P, Green D (2016) Australia’s sustainable energy transition: the disjointed politics of decarbonisation. Environ Innov Soc Trans 21:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CR, Lumsden C, O’Dowd S, Birnie RV (2005) ‘Green on green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plan Manag 48(6):853–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA, Dyke SL (2016) Pre-and post-installation community perceptions of wind farm projects: the case of Roskrow Barton (Cornwall, UK). Land use Policy 52:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink M (2010) Contested environmental policy infrastructure: Socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities. Environ Impact Assess Rev 30(5):302–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink M (2012) The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: renewable as common pool resources. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):822–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink M (2013) The next phase in social acceptance of renewable innovation. EDI Q 5(1):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35(5):2683–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue B, Ma Z, Geng Y, Heck P, Ren W, Tobias M, Fujita T et al (2015) A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:338–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaqub O, Castle-Clarke S, Sevdalis N, Chataway J (2014) Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review. Soc Sci Med 112:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Breda McCarthy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCarthy, B., Eagle, L. (2021). Winds of Change: Engaging with Conflicting Perspectives in Renewable Energy. In: Hay, R., Eagle, L., Bhati, A. (eds) Broadening Cultural Horizons in Social Marketing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8517-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics