Amending Concept DA - Waterloo Metro Quarter OSD

Please find attached EES response

Based on the information provided, the proposal does not constitute a Scheduled Activity under Schedule 1 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act). At this stage, the EPA does not consider that the proposal will require an Environment Protection Licence (EPL) under the POEO Act.
As an advisory note, the development will be located in the vicinity of tunnels containing operational rail lines, for which the EPA has a regulatory responsibility. The consent should include acceptable vibration and ground borne noise limits for spaces within the development drawn from the EPA’s Rail Infrastructure Noise Guideline (EPA, 2013) and Assessing Vibration: A Technical Guideline (DECC, 2006).
As the applicant is a private developer and not a NSW public authority, the EPA would not be the appropriate regulatory authority under the POEO Act for the environmental performance of the OSD project.
The EPA has no comment on EIS.

The reduction in height of the building will look much better!

I live very close to this project and while I am happy for such a project to go ahead I am very concerned about the size of it and the extra traffic it may cause. The car access to my building is via Botany Lane and the one way section of Buckland st. This is slow enough with the amount of traffic now and I fear this will become even slower with an increase. I am also concerned about the potential loss of sunlight to my apartment in the afternoon, particularly in winter when it's most needed.

Please find attached a detailed submission commenting on numerous design aspects of the scheme.

Project ruins the character of Waterloo & also to rip up heavy rail system is illogical .

The REDWatch submission is attached

A copy of the TfNSW response letter is attached.

Dear Russell

Please find attached the City's consolidated response to the Waterloo OSD SSD applications.

Regards
David Zabell