Elsevier

Economic Analysis and Policy

Volume 55, September 2017, Pages 124-131
Economic Analysis and Policy

Full length article
Household debt, housing prices and resilience

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.05.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent rises in the ratio of Australian housing prices and household debt have become an issue of public debate. This paper outlines the Reserve Bank of Australia’s investigation into this issue. Three areas are examined: aggregate trends in housing prices, debt and household incomes; the distribution of household debt and their effect on the economy as a whole. It is found that part of the cause of the rising ratio of house prices to household debt has been a recent slowdown in household income, strong demand from overseas buyers and strong population growth. While borrowing has added to the upward pressure on prices the underlying cause is embedded in the supply–demand dynamics. It is concluded that the recent increase in household debt relative to incomes has made the economy less resilient to future shocks.

Introduction

The rise in both household debt and housing prices is an issue which has attracted considerable attention over recent times. It is understandable why this is so. The cost of housing and how we finance it matters to us all. We all need somewhere to live and for many people, their home is their largest single asset. Real estate is also the major form of collateral for bank lending. The levels of debt and housing prices also affect the resilience of our economy to future shocks. Beyond these economic effects, high levels of debt and housing prices have broader effects on the communities in which we live. The high cost of housing is a real issue for many Australians and can have serious side-effects. High levels of debt and high housing costs can also reinforce the existing distribution of wealth in our society, making social and geographic mobility more difficult. So it is understandable why Australians are so interested in these issues.

At the Reserve Bank, we too have been focused on these issues in the context of our monetary policy and financial stability responsibilities. This paper outlined this work in three broad areas. First, is the work on understanding the aggregate trends and their causes, focussing on high ratio of house prices to household income. The substantial increase in the value of households’ financial assets and the record high in the ratio of household wealth to income is also highlighted. Second is the study of how debt is distributed across the community. Here the more pronounced rise in the debt-to-income for higher–income households is discussed as is the almost doubling of households with debt three time their income. Third, how the level of debt and housing prices affect the way the economy operates is discussed as is how this may affect the economy’s resilience to future shocks.

Section snippets

Aggregate trends

Fig. 1 provides a good summary of the aggregate picture. It shows the ratios of nationwide housing prices and household debt to household income. Housing prices and debt both rose considerably from the mid-1990s to the early 2000s. The ratios then moved sideways for the better part of a decade — in some years they were up and in others they were down. Then, in the past few years, these ratios have been rising again.1

The distribution of debt

I would now like to turn to the distribution of housing debt across households. This is important, as it is not the ‘average’ household that gets into trouble. At the Reserve Bank we have devoted considerable resources to understanding this distribution. One important source of household-level information is the survey of Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA).

If we look across the income distribution, it is clear that the rise in the debt-to-income ratio has been most

Impact on the economy and policy considerations

The third element of this review are the implications of all this for the way the economy operates and its resilience.

It is now commonplace to say that housing prices and debt levels matter because of financial stability. What people typically have in mind is that a severe correction in property prices when balance sheets are highly leveraged could make for instability in the banking system, damaging the economy. So the traditional financial stability concern is that the banks get in trouble

Conclusion

I hope these remarks help provide some insight into the Reserve Bank’s thinking about housing prices and household debt. As household balance sheets have changed, so too has the way that the economy works. Both from an individual and an economy-wide perspective, we need to pay attention to how the higher level of debt affects our resilience to future shocks.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Gianni La Cava, Andre Liew and Fiona Price for assistance in the preparation of this talk.

References (7)

  • ByresW.

    Prudential Perspectives on the Property Market

    (2017)
  • KohlerM. et al.

    Long-run trends in housing price growth

    RBA Bulletin

    (2015)
  • La Cava, G., Hughson, H., Kaplan, G., 2016. The Household Cash Flow Channel of Monetary Policy, RBA Research Discussion...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Based on a presentation to the Economic Society of Australia (QLD branch) Business Lunch, Brisbane, Queensland – 4 May 2017.

View full text